Quantcast
Channel: Queer Cinema(s) – Cinema of the World
Viewing all 733 articles
Browse latest View live

Dee Rees – Pariah (2011)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Plot / Synopsis
Adepero Oduye portrays Alike (pronounced ah-lee-kay), a 17-year-old African-American woman who lives with her parents Audrey and Arthur (Kim Wayans and Charles Parnell) and younger sister Sharonda (Sahra Mellesse) in Brooklyn’s Fort Greene neighborhood. Alike is quietly but firmly embracing her identity as a lesbian. With the sometimes boisterous support of her best friend, out lesbian Laura (Pernell Walker), Alike is especially eager to find a girlfriend. At home, her parents’ marriage is strained and there is further tension in the household whenever Alike’s development becomes a topic of discussion. Pressed by her mother into making the acquaintance of a colleague’s daughter, Bina (Aasha Davis), Alike finds Bina to be unexpectedly refreshing to socialize with. Wondering how much she can confide in her family, Alike strives to get through adolescence with grace, humor, and tenacity – sometimes succeeding, sometimes not, but always moving forward. (C) Official Site







http://www.nitroflare.com/view/9B1050DD780374C/Pariah.2011.Limited.BRRiP.XViD.AC3-MAJESTiC.mkv

Language(s):English
Subtitles:None


Alice Wu – Saving Face (2004)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

A romantic comedy about right, wrong and everything in between

A Chinese-American surgeon, living in Manhattan, is shocked when her single mother shows up on her doorstep pregnant. To help her mom save face and avoid the taboo in the Chinese community of an unmarried woman pregnant, the doctor helps her mom find Mr. Right. Cultures clash in this film that explores culture shock.


http://www.nitroflare.com/view/AB5DE7D5A5A2708/alliance-saving.face-xvid.avi
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/ABA6A41D6C8A94E/saving_face.XviD.english.rar
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/D56EF3F87903EAB/saving_face.XviD.francais.rar

Language(s):English / Mandarin / Shanghainese
Subtitles:english,French

Ki-duk Kim – Samaria AKA Samaritan Girl (2004)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Jae-Young is an amateur prostitute who sleeps with men while her best friend Yeo-Jin “manages” her, fixing dates, taking care of the money and making sure the coast is clear. When Jae-Young falls in love with one of those man she suppresses her feelings towards him in respect of her friend who’s jealous. One Day Yeo-Jin fails in doing her job overlooking police officers looking for under-aged prostitutes. In order to not get caught Jae-Young jumps out of a window almost killing herself. On her deathbed, she wishes to see the man again whom she fell in love with and turned away from. But the man only agrees if Yeo-Jin sleeps with him. She does but as they arrive in the hospital Jae-Young is already dead. Trying to understand her best friend, Yeo-Jin tracks down every man she slept with and does the same. As her father learns about this he gets on revenge with fatal consequences…




http://www.nitroflare.com/view/45C10D3518AF138/Samaria.avi
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/51B5086348FC045/Samaria.idx
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/E8CF2813958F8EB/Samaria.sub

Language(s):Korean
Subtitles:English

Cheryl Dunye – The Watermelon Woman (1996)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

From IMDB:
Cheryl is young, Black, and lesbian, working in Philadelphia with her best friend Tamara and consumed by a film project: to make a video about her search for a Black actress from Philly who appeared in films in the 30s and was known as the Watermelon Woman. Following various leads, Cheryl discovers the Watermelon Woman’s stage name and real name and surmises that the actress had a long affair with Martha Page, a White woman and one of Hollywood’s few female directors. As she’s discovering these things, Cheryl becomes involved with Diana, who’s also White. The affair strains Cheryl’s friendship with Tamara. More discoveries bring Cheryl (and us, her audience) to new realizations.



http://www.nitroflare.com/view/A80195D079BB294/watermelon_woman.avi

Language(s):English
Subtitles:none

Jenifer Malmqvist – Födelsedag AKA Birthday (2010)

Isaac Julien – Derek [+Extras] (2008)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Quote:
An artist spends his or her existence examining life through their art, so why is it often so hard to use art to examine the artist’s life in turn? We’ve all seen biopics that merely scratch the surface of a creative existence, either spending too much time focusing on the travails of the individual and leaving their creations by the wayside, or flat studies of the work alone that seemingly forget that there was a person behind the words or images.

Isaac Julien’s new documentary Derek tries to have the best of everything in its portrait of painter and visionary filmmaker Derek Jarman, and for the most part, it succeeds. As a tribute to the man, Julien and his collaborators, producer Colin MacCabe and actress Tilda Swinton, let the viewer behind the curtain to see who Jarman was and what fueled his inspired works; at the same time, we see pieces of that work, and we learn what it meant to him as a person and to the culture at large.

Jarman made a variety of films through the ’70s, ’80s, and early ’90s that broke the boundaries between the fine arts and cinematic language. He also blazed a trail for new queer cinema, adopting the gaudy style of rebels like Ken Russell (who hired the young artist to build sets for The Devils) and the in-your-face, ramshackle production of the punk rock movement. At the same time, movies like Sebastiane and The Tempest display an understanding of a more classical model, finding subversive elements in the old that spoke to the newness of a more open, contemporary world. As a maverick in art and in life, Jarman always walked it like he talked it, adding his voice to political outcries and openly living with HIV. Even as his health dwindled, leading to his death in 1994, he still challenged conventions, making his final epic, Blue, which asked audiences to stare at a blue screen and listen to various monologues that would conjure images within the blank color. His musings touched so many that, to this day, people still travel to Derek’s home in Dungeness to look at the rock garden he sculpted in his private hours.

Julien’s film is constructed as a collage, using old super-8 home movies from all the periods of Jarman’s life, news footage of his activities, and clips from his films to create a cinematic object that is as interesting to look at as it is informative–something its subject could certainly appreciate. As the running backbone of Derek, the director uses two main sources: a 1991 interview Jarman gave to MacCabe in anticipation of HIV and AIDS sapping his strength and new footage of Swinton, a regular Jarman collaborator, visiting important places in his life while her voiceover reads from a tribute she wrote to her friend. Derek may be a short 76 minutes, but in that time, these devotees get closer to the essence of the man they seek to honor than most bloated puff pieces do in twice the time.

Derek should play just as well to Jarman’s fans and the uninitiated alike. I first became aware of his work via his music videos for bands like the Smiths, Pet Shop Boys, and Suede, and I’m ashamed to admit that I’ve been remiss in seeking out his more personal endeavors. Having now watched Derek and gaining a newfound respect for its hero, it’s a situation I’m going to quickly remedy.





Quote:
“It has snowed since you were here and your tracks are covered,” says actress Tilda Swinton at the beginning of Derek, a documentary/love letter to filmmaker Derek Jarman. “Fortunately, you made them on hard ground.” It’s been almost fourteen years since Jarman passed away from an AIDS-related illness, and though he left us with some utterly unique, indispensable films like Sebastiane, Caravaggio, and Edward II, Swinton is right — a lot of snow has fallen since then in the annals of queer cinema. Some of it has been fierce and independent, but much of it has been safe and middlebrow. To watch a film like Derek is to be reminded how much of the former we need — and how rarely we get it.

The film is directed by Jarman’s friend Isaac Julien (Young Soul Rebels) and draws much of its power from three indispensible sources: Swinton’s narration (recorded from a “letter to Derek” she wrote for the Edinburgh Film Festival in 2002), a daylong interview with Colin MacCabe that shows Jarman to be cheeky and relaxed in the face of illness, and Jarman himself, who made countless short, experimental films at his Warhol-like Bankside Studio. Many of them are glimpsed for the first time in Derek, and so, too, do we get glimpses of the man and mind who produced some of these indisputably original works of art. To hear about his schooling — which he dubs “a real crash course in Catholic brainwashing” — or to learn about his strained relationship with his father will no doubt open up new footnotes in some of Jarman’s most-used themes. But to get valuable face time with the filmmaker is to wonder what he’d make of today’s film world — and whether anyone now will make of it what he once did.

http://www.nitroflare.com/view/79167012DF52E31/DEREK.avi
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/0A7CC8C393012DA/Derek_EXTRAS.rar

Language(s):English
Subtitles:None

William Wyler – Ben-Hur (1959)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Synopsis by Hal Erickson
This 1959 version of Lew Wallace’s best-selling novel, which had already seen screen versions in 1907 and 1926, went on to win 11 Academy Awards. Adapted by Karl Tunberg and a raft of uncredited writers including Gore Vidal and Maxwell Anderson, the film once more recounts the tale of Jewish prince Judah Ben-Hur (Charlton Heston), who lives in Judea with his family during the time that Jesus Christ was becoming known for his “radical” teachings. Ben-Hur’s childhood friend Messala (Stephen Boyd) is now an ambitious Roman tribune; when Ben-Hur refuses to help Messala round up local dissidents on behalf of the emperor, Messala pounces on the first opportunity to exact revenge on his onetime friend. Tried on a trumped-up charge of attempting to kill the provincial governor (whose head was accidentally hit by a falling tile), Ben-Hur is condemned to the Roman galleys, while his mother (Martha Scott) and sister (Cathy O’Donnell) are imprisoned. But during a sea battle, Ben-Hur saves the life of commander Quintus Arrius (Jack Hawkins), who, in gratitude, adopts Ben-Hur as his son and gives him full control over his stable of racing horses.Ben-Hur never gives up trying to find his family or exact revenge on Messala. At crucial junctures in his life, he also crosses the path of Jesus, and each time he benefits from it. The highlight of the film’s 212 minutes is its now-legendary chariot race, staged largely by stunt expert Yakima Canutt. Ben-Hur’s Oscar haul included Best Picture, Best Director for the legendary William Wyler, Best Actor for Heston, and Best Supporting Actor for Welsh actor Hugh Griffith as an Arab sheik.





http://www.nitroflare.com/view/0D540E952E210BF/_William_Wyler___1959__Ben-Hur_CD1.avi
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/1AC56AEC2C4219D/_William_Wyler___1959__Ben-Hur_CD1.srt
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/72CF810B383300B/_William_Wyler___1959__Ben-Hur_CD2.avi
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/DC0A7380E31692A/_William_Wyler___1959__Ben-Hur_CD2.srt
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/27EA2C229DA622C/_William_Wyler___1959__Ben-Hur_CD3.avi
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/089558EEF4ABEF4/_William_Wyler___1959__Ben-Hur_CD3.srt

Language(s):English
Subtitles:english easy subs

Gianna Sobol – Public Relations (2010)


Pedro Almodóvar – La mala educación AKA Bad Education (2004)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Quote:
The wag who first suggested running the trailer for Bad Education before screenings of The Passion of the Christ in southern France deserves a rosette for provocation beyond the call of duty. But while the region’s priests have responded with predictable outrage, they should have taken a closer look at the film itself. To the character of the paedophile Father Manolo, Pedro Almodóvar extends the same compassion and pity with which he regarded the various sex offenders in Matador (1986), Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down! (1989) and Talk to Her (2002). Almodóvar has the most democratic sensibility in cinema since Andy Warhol. Whatever passes before his camera is met with curiosity or understanding.

This creates some unusual difficulties in Bad Education. The slow-motion footage of pubescent boys frolicking in a river invites us to see the children from Manolo’s perspective, when in fact he is not observing them at that point – the erotic reading of their horseplay belongs uniquely to Almodóvar. Similarly, the movie’s most hypnotic image – an overhead shot of rows of white-vested boys exercising in the schoolyard – would be problematic in its echoes of the homoeroticism of 100 Days Before the Command (1990), Like Grains of Sand (1995) and Beau Travail (1999), even if it were not the case that, once again, it is Almodóvar, not Manolo, who is investing the children with sexual properties. Unless, that is, the elevated camera hints that a higher power is complicit in this voyeurism, an idea that surfaces in comic form when a priest who is reminded that God has witnessed his wrongdoings remarks: “Yes, but He’s on our side.”

If the Catholic church is not placated by the film’s generosity toward its errant servants, it might take consolation from the fact that Bad Education is more concerned with the traffic between past and present, life and art, sin and forgiveness. From its credit sequence, which plays like Saul Bass animating a Gilbert & George catalogue defaced by Joe Orton and Kenneth Halliwell, the film aspires to the texture of a collage or mosaic. It’s there in the layers of faded, half-peeled movie posters outside the derelict Olympo Cinema, where the boyhood friends Enrique and Ignacio once masturbated one another as Sara Montiel loomed on the screen before them.

And you can see it in José Luis Alcaine’s deep-focus photography and Antxón Gómez’s art design, particularly in the office of the adult Enrique, now a successful film director. Ignacio arrives there clutching a story (‘The Visit’) based on their school days, while around them the segmented background and foreground compete in an ongoing and symbolic war of mise en scène reminiscent of The Bitter Tears of Petra Von Kant (1972). Mosaics are most strongly represented on the exterior of Ignacio’s apartment building, with the same patterns inside on the walls and curtains. The suggestion in these mosaics of a gaily coloured puzzle, of unruly pieces put together without ever quite fitting, could not be more appropriate.

Then there are the characters’ slippery identities to contend with. In Enrique’s film of ‘The Visit’, Ignacio hopes to play the transsexual Zahara, whose real name is Ignacio, who in turn poses as her own sister to confront her abuser, Father Manolo; Ignacio himself goes by the name of Ángel, but is later revealed to be Juan, brother to the actual Ignacio. Some characters, like Zahara’s friend Paquito, don’t actually exist outside ‘The Visit’, while others, such as the leather-jacketed Enrique with whom Zahara has sex, are alternative incarnations of characters we have already met. Scenes from ‘The Visit’ are played out as flashbacks, though they are no more definitive in their version of events than the erroneous account of Ignacio’s death that is corrected when Father Manolo arrives under his real name, Berenguer.

Any description of the plot, which incorporates flashbacks within the film within the film, risks becoming a pointless itinerary. When a film-maker exercises this much control, there is an enormous gain, but a small loss too. And for all its authentic Almodóvarian passion, the movie sometimes resembles a clinical experiment in storytelling. The most potent antidote to this is the miraculous four-sided performance by Gael García Bernal, who plays Zahara as well as Juan-playing-Zahara, Juan-posing-as-Ignacio, and plain old Juan. Bernal not only looks divine in everything from platinum wigs to retro sportswear, he also displays an emotional dexterity to match his frequent Gaultier-designed costume changes. When the film gets in a spin, Bernal is its compass.

Without him, the movie’s symmetry and self-reflexiveness could have squeezed the life out of the material. Moments that provoke a strong connection are likely to be those that have the most clarity and simplicity – Manolo’s hunt for Enrique and Ignacio in the school dormitory, or the subtle editing that articulates Ignacio’s abuse (to the heartbreaking strains of ‘Moon River’), or the fraught poolside scene in which the adult Enrique is silently rebuffed by the man he believes to be Ignacio.

These episodes are marked by a spare visual style, an emancipation from physical clutter, and the characters themselves are on the same quest to strip away unnecessary embellishments. Audiences who find themselves short of breath during parts of Bad Education, as on a climb to high altitudes, will notice a shift in the final section, which peters out quite deliberately, like All about My Mother (1999) and Talk to Her before it. As the truth about the demise of the real Ignacio comes to light, the movie lets out a sigh of resignation; the multi-layered facade that had kept us entertained for nearly two hours is packed away, literally during the scene in which the camera retreats from a movie set as the lights are extinguished one by one. Truth brings its own rewards to the characters, but for Almodóvar it also represents a small death. In the final image, Enrique clutches Ignacio’s last, incomplete letter and slumps against his gate. The eye can’t help but experience a kind of anti-climax as it registers the first plain shot in this whole vibrant movie. Ryan Gilbey, Sight and Sound, June 2004







http://www.nitroflare.com/view/3E9D44FE4F0D104/Pedro_Almodovar_-_%282004%29_Bad_Education.mkv

Language(s):Spanish, Latin
Subtitles:English

Peter Bogdanovich – Saint Jack [+Extras] (1979)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Quote:
After a couple of major studio flops, Peter Bogdanovich returned to his 1960s filmmaking roots with this Roger Corman-produced low budget film. Easygoing expatriate Jack Flowers (Ben Gazzara) makes his living in early-1970s Singapore legally and illegally looking after the needs of American and British businessmen, such as the mild-mannered William Leigh (Denholm Elliott). With his gift for putting clients and girls at ease, Jack opens a successful brothel, but pressure from local mobsters soon puts him out of business. Ever the survivor, he starts working for the shady, Cuban-cigar-smoking Eddie Schuman (Bogdanovich) as a pimp for GIs on breaks from Vietnam. But Jack’s conscience starts to dog him when Schuman hires him to take compromising pictures of a visiting Senator (George Lazenby). Adapted by Bogdanovich, Howard O. Sackler, and Paul Theroux from Theroux’s novel, Saint Jack offers a pimp with a heart of gold, who is less an ugly colonial American abroad than an outsider trying to make the best of a bad situation.Shooting on location in Singapore, cinematographer Robby Müller lends an appropriately gritty look to the matter-of-fact narrative. With restrained and forceful performances by Gazzara and Elliott, Saint Jack was something of a succès d’estime for the embattled Bogdanovich, winning the Italian Journalist Award for Best Film at the 1979 Venice Film Festival. While not a box-office success, it remains an affecting and unsung character study of a man’s desire to forge a reasonably honorable life in a dishonorable profession.



From a interview in The Guardian:
Q1: I lived in Singapore for a few years and there are many stories there of Saint Jack and how you told the Singapore government that you were doing one thing and did something else with the movie. Could you tell the truth about what happened with that, please?

PB: Well, what happened was… the book, Saint Jack by Paul Theroux, was banned in Singapore, because they did not want to cop to the fact that Singapore was a city where American soldiers came, during Vietnam, for R&R, which really meant getting girls and so on. And they didn’t want to admit that that happened. So the book was banned. And when I decided to make the movie, we travelled around most of Asia looking for a place to shoot it besides Singapore, because we knew we couldn’t shoot it there. But Manila, Hong Kong, wherever we went, it wasn’t as good as Singapore, obviously, because that’s where it took place. So we decided we would shoot it in Singapore after all, but we couldn’t tell them that it was Saint Jack because they never would have let us. So we told them we were shooting a movie called Jack of Hearts. And one afternoon, I dictated to my Chinese secretary a totally different plot, about a guy who comes from Buffalo to Singapore to open a nightclub or something. Actually he wants to open a whorehouse. I talked it out and described all the scenes – it was complete fiction, it was kind of a cross between Pal Joey and Love is a Many-Splendoured Thing. Quite terrible. But this is what we handed out to everybody, and nobody knew we were shooting Saint Jack at all. I was there for six months. Got back to Los Angeles and – remember Roderick Mann? – he came over to do an interview with him, and like an idiot I told him the truth. And of course, he printed it, it was a good story, and well… Headlines in Singapore: “Bogdanovich tricks Singapore”. Vicious editorials and the picture, of course, was banned in Singapore. Though I am told there are bootleg copies there. So that’s what really happened. It was sort of fun to do it that way, though, I have to admit.



http://www.nitroflare.com/view/EAF984A9BD78AEA/Peter_Bogdanovich.mkv
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/8194EFFA65EC220/Saint_Jack.mkv
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/36B548BB2D4E72B/trailer.mkv

Language(s):English dual audio with commentary
Subtitles:none

Sung-eun Lee – I Am Jin Young (2006)

René Clément – Plein soleil AKA Purple Noon [+Extras] (1960)

$
0
0

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Synopsis:
‘Tom Ripley and Philippe Greenleaf are lately inseparable friends. They’re both idling in Europe, but on papa Greenleaf’s dime. Philippe’s fiancee Marge feels sorry for Tom but resents his presence, while Philippe’s other friend, Freddie, considers Tom Ripley a worthless moocher. But there’s more to Tom Ripley, the mimic, the forger, the talented criminal improviser, than anyone, even Tom Ripley himself, can guess.’
– J. Spurlin (IMDb)







Interview with Rene Clement (In French without subtitles):


http://www.nitroflare.com/view/D950F148626E57C/Plein.soleil.1960.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.avi
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/F6507344D62A3C0/Plein.soleil.1960.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.English.srt
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/A8F4ADF232E1C25/Plein.soleil.1960.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.German.srt
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/F352DF86FDAF9A9/Plein.soleil.1960.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.Portuguese.srt
http://www.nitroflare.com/view/074F53DE288AE8A/Plein.soleil.1960.Interview.mit.Rene.Clement.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.avi

English srt:
http://subscene.com/subtitles/purple-noon-plein-soleil/english/714489

Language(s):French
Subtitles:English, German, Portuguese (srt)

Raj Amit Kumar – Unfreedom (2014)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

The movie that is BANNED in India.
Quote:
When a film is “banned” by the Censor Board of Film Certification, you know you are onto something. Well, that is exactly the case with Raj Amit Kumar’s film Unfreedom.

Homosexuality.

Islam.

Thinking outside of convention.

Unfreedom breaks all the “rules”.

The film follows two different lives, the storyline pivoting on a female same-sex relationship and the dangers of religious extremism.

Shifting between New York and Delhi, one story explores the kidnapping of a liberal Muslim scholar by a Muslim terrorist. The other story dives into a woman’s journey -a woman secretly in love with another woman. She faces the challenges of this love when she refuses an arranged marriage set up by her religious father.

Classified as “too controversial” for release in India, the film was released in North American theatres on the 29th of May 2015 and simultaneously on digital channels via Film Buff.

Plot:
Set in two different cities, New York and New Delhi, the film approaches sexuality and violence head on with a focus on the Muslim and LGBT identities.

In New York arrives a fundamentalist Muslim Mohammed Husain, imprisoned by his brutal past, on a mission to kidnap and kill a peaceful Muslim scholar, Fareed Rahmani. “The choices we make, when we are most cornered in life, define who we are.” Once they come face to face, the only way out is through a true examination of the bare bones of each one’s existence to make a choice.

In New Delhi, Leela Singh, a closeted homosexual girl leaves her orthodox cop father’s home with a mission to kidnap her activist bisexual lover, Sakhi Taylor, and marry her. Not only do the lovers need to come to terms with their own differences, they need to face Devraj, the truth of the society they live in.

Set in the most archetypal cities of economic and patriarchal control, four characters come face to face with gruesome acts of violence in a battle of identities against unfreedom. “Unfreedom” examines the struggle between the powerful and powerless and those who strive to stand against dominating torturing socio political injustices.

Production:
Hari Nair is the cinematographer of the film with Wayne Sharpe and Jesse Kotansky composing the soundtrack. Resul Pookutty did the sound design.

In India, the Central Board of Film Certification refused to certify the movie for public release in India.

Censorship:

In India, the film was refused certification by the Examining Committee. A revising committee of the Censor Board proposed cuts to the director, Raj Amit Kumar. He refused and appealed against the Censor Board’s demand for cuts to the Indian Government’s Information and Broadcasting Appellate Tribunal FCAT. In response to his appeal, the authorities completely banned the film regardless of cuts. The news of the ban gained widespread coverage in the media.

In a video released on April 9, 2015 on YouTube, Raj Amit Kumar states that the Censor Board should rate or certify a movie, instead of banning and offering cuts. He also said that he would keep sending signed petitions to the Prime Minister and Censor Board, until there is a real change. The director is seeking support from people who believe in freedom of speech.






http://www.nitroflare.com/view/EE7C0DA6113B024/Un-freedom_%282015%29.avi

Language(s):English, Hindi
Subtitles:None

Gian Carlo Menotti – The Medium (1951)

Nina Reyes Rosenberg – Organism (2010)


John Frankenheimer – Seconds (1966)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Quote:
Have you ever suffered from a bout of insomnia, and ended up channel hopping into the small hours of the morning as a result? And having done so, have you ever came across a film that you’ve never heard of, yet it exerts a near hypnotic pull over you, digging itself under your skin ensuring that you’ll be thinking about it for days afterwards? If so, then you’ll recognise the kind of film that Seconds is.

The opening credits are stark black and white close-ups of various facial parts, pulled into weird and twisted shapes by the camera focus, while Jerry Goldsmith’s harsh and brooding score booms out over the top. Even from the credits, it is clear that Seconds is going to be a hallucinatory and powerful experience.

We then join Arthur Hamilton (John Randolph), a businessman rapidly approaching his pensionable age, and is seemingly extremely uncomfortable because of it. However, this is also due to the fact that an old friend gives him mysterious instructions to get in touch with a company that will change his life. Intrigued, Hamilton agrees, and he finds himself on the receiving end of an incredible offer. For a quite considerable fee, the company will literally give Hamilton a new lease of life. He will undergo surgery and awake a much younger man with a new identity, leaving behind another corpse to take his old place in society, leaving only one question – where do they get the corpses from? Hamilton is unsure, after all who wants to live forever, and what about his family that he can never see again? However, the two men in charge of the company (Will Geer and Jeff Corey) demolish his argument in a most chilling scene, and Hamilton soon finds himself reborn as Tony Wilson (Rock Hudson). Yet, despite waking up in a body most of us probably would pick given the choice, “Wilson” is not a happy man and doesn’t take to his new existence at all.

John Frankenheimer’s career highlight is arguably The Manchurian Candidate, yet Seconds runs it very close, repeating a lot of the themes that the former film explored. It’s a film drenched in paranoia as we are in the dark about the company as much as Wilson is. We never find out who they are, where they operate from, or how the actual surgery works. The few times we see the outside world it seems strangely deserted, and in a ghoulishly ironic twist Hamilton is ferried to the company by visiting a slaughterhouse and hitching a ride in the back of a meat truck. Frankenheimer sets the film in cramped interiors filmed in gritty black and white, whilst sticking the camera into the actors faces for sweaty closeups or actually attaching it to the actors to create a nervous, edgy paranoid sense of constantly being watched. This atmosphere continues right throughout an orgy scene that is disturbing rather than sinfully gleeful, right to a crackerjack ending that sends you out with your head reeling and your stomach tumbling. It’s an ending that ranks alongside Night of the Living Dead from the same period, as one of the bleakest, yet thematically perfect climaxes that American cinema is likely to offer.

If Frankenheimer’s target in The Manchurian Candidate was politics and the media, then here it’s the wealthy classes and their never ending quest for vanity, perfection and the chance to hang on to their wealth for as long as inhumanely possible. Yes, they may be able to wake up in a new youthful body, but at what price? The 1960s was a period of great social change, but the Reborns are stuck in the past, trying to cling onto the dying of the light, and it’s not glorious or noble, but absolutely sickening. They seek to celebrate life, but instead reek of death.

Randolph’s performance is key to that, as a man seemingly terrified of passing away sometime in the next decade, but it’s Hudson who’s the biggest surprise here. A world away from the Sirk melodramas and the Doris Day romantic comedies that he’s most famous for, he gives a stunningly anguished and adult performance. Like us, Hudson is off balance and off kilter throghout as he becomes slowly aware that everyone knows more about his situation than he does, and it terrifies him, such as the tremendous scene where he goes from boorish lush to a complete mental breakdown seemingly in one take. It’s a performance that doesn’t give any easy answers to the situation, and helps give the ending the kick that it has. The whole film has the feel of a noose being slowly tightened around your neck while you lie awake at night.

With it’s edgy, paranoid energy and slippery grasp on reality, the legacy of Seconds can be seen from One Hour Photo to American Psycho, to Brazil and to Hidden. For it’s full effect, Seconds is best enjoyed late at night, with the lights out where it can work its persuasive terrors on you without interruption. The film is an unceasing nightmare that you don’t wake up from.






http://www.nitroflare.com/view/9A75017AD53030E/John_Frankenheimer_-_%281966%29_Seconds.mkv

Language(s):English
Subtitles:English

Michael Winterbottom – Butterfly Kiss (1995)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Quote:
Winterbottom’s theatrical feature debut Butterfly Kiss was released into UK theatres in August 1995. Set in a dystopian environment limited almost entirely to motorways, service stations and motels, it charted the dysfunctional lesbian relationship between the violent and erratic Eunice (Amanda Plummer) and the credulous Miriam (Saskia Reeves). In so doing it offered up a portrayal of Britain that had not previously been seen on its cinema screens. Although the film garnered mixed responses, a couple of reviewers such as Derek Malcolm seized on it as heralding the arrival of a remarkable new talent in British cinema (2). Indeed, the film was to lay out many of the themes and techniques that would come to define Winterbottom’s oeuvre.

From the very beginning, Butterfly Kiss announces itself as a sometimes challenging and uncomfortable viewing experience. In its black-and-white title sequence, Miriam sits facing the camera, sometimes staring at it, sometimes avoiding its gaze. (Later footage reveals that the material is drawn from an interview in which she talks about Eunice, and that the title sequence edits together only the silences between bursts of speech.) The awkwardness that Miriam’s body language gives forth is compounded by the absence of a soundtrack and by the series of jump cuts. These anticipate the disjunctive editing of the following scene, which introduces us to Eunice as she walks along a motorway. The editing technique serves to disorient and discomfort the viewer, frustrating attempts to predict what will happen next. As it transpires, Eunice enters a petrol station where she acts in a highly agitated fashion, unreasonably convinced that the sales assistant is the woman called Judith whom she obsessively seeks. Cut to a brief shot of the sales assistant’s corpse on the shop floor. The tone of the film is constantly unsettling as Eunice’s volatility combines with a non-linear structure of shots in such a way as to ensure that the viewer rarely has any idea what to expect, in either spatial, narrative or emotional terms.

If the film sometimes arouses apprehension through its elisions, at other times it graphically delivers scenes that are both shocking and unexpected. A scene in which Eunice removes her top to reveal a body laden with piercings and heavy chains, which have bruised it black and blue, produced gasps from many of the cinema audience with whom I first watched the film. One other especially uncomfortable scene occurs much later when Miriam has sex with Robert (Ricky Tomlinson) in his truck. This act is already difficult to watch as it is abundantly clear that Miriam has no desire to partake in it and does so only at Eunice’s behest. It does not get any more pleasurable when Eunice clambers into the truck and bludgeons him to death mid coitus. Although such scenes render the film intermittently shocking, throughout the film there runs a thread of universal themes that sometimes encourage engagement and identification even whilst individual moments temporarily repel.

Writer Frank Cottrell Boyce characterises the theme of Butterfly Kiss as spiritual despair (3). This is a theme that will recur in several of Winterbottom’s features, whether they are scripted by Cottrell Boyce or not. The theme is most apparent in Eunice’s belief that God must have stopped noticing her, or else He would surely see her killing people and do something to prevent it. Such despair is also apparent in Miriam’s life and it is the basis of her attachment to Eunice. The gradation between their degrees of desolation and the extent to which an audience might reasonably be expected to identify with each of them is clearly symbolised by their nicknames: “Mi” and “Eu”, or “me” and “you”. If the narrative may be seen to be centred on these two characters, it may equally be thought of as being defined by the environment they inhabit. The idea that both personal identity and life choices derive significantly from one’s surroundings is another theme that permeates many of Winterbottom’s later films. It is, moreover, a notion that can help to explain (and even justify) a range of behaviours to which an audience might otherwise find it difficult to relate. From: Senses of Cinema by Deborah Allison








http://www.nitroflare.com/view/ECF8937F4F1DCEF/Michael_Winterbottom_-_%281995%29_Butterfly_Kiss.mkv

Language(s):English
Subtitles:None

Christophe Honoré – Métamorphoses (2014)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Quote:
One of France’s most unpredictable writer-directors, Christophe Honoré (Dans Paris, Love Songs) offers an audacious, erotically upfront re-reading of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, enacted by a fearless cast of (largely unknown) young actors in contemporary French settings. Kicking off with a startling take on the story of Diana and Actaeon, Honoré’s film follows the wanderings of Europa (Akili), a high-school student who encounters a marauding truck driver – none other than Jupiter (Hirel), father of the gods. Streams of stories within stories bring the old transformation myths a modern-day slant – Narcissus as an arrogant teenage heart-throb, Orpheus as a charismatic housing-estate preacher – and add a multi-racial, polysexual perspective, teasing out the perversity, violence and rapture of classical legend. You may detect shades of Borowczyk, Pasolini, Rohmer and Derek Jarman’s Sebastiane, but this savage, rhapsodic, moving film is something entirely its own. A fabulous soundtrack completes the wayward beauty –BFI









http://nitroflare.com/view/211E69C7B3EAD4A/Christophe_Honore_-_%282014%29_Metamorphoses.mkv

Language(s):French
Subtitles:Dutch, English

James Whale – Bride of Frankenstein (1935)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Sequel to 1931’s Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein was directed by James Whale and stars Boris Karloff as The Monster, Elsa Lanchester in the dual role of his mate and Mary Shelley, Colin Clive as Henry Frankenstein and Ernest Thesiger as Doctor Septimus Pretorius.

The film follows on immediately from the events of the earlier film, and is rooted in a subplot of the original Mary Shelley novel, Frankenstein (1818). In the film, a chastened Henry Frankenstein abandons his plans to create life, only to be tempted and finally coerced by the Monster, encouraged by Henry’s old mentor Dr. Pretorius, into constructing a mate for him.


“Interestingly, Whale did not want to make a sequel to his incredibly successful 1931 FRANKENSTEIN, and bowed to studio pressure only when he received assurance of absolute control. The result is perhaps his most personal film–a strange collage of Gothic horror, black humor, religious motifs, and sexual innuendo–and one of the great classics of the genre.”



Studio: Universal Pictures
Producer: Carl Laemmle Jr.

Music: Franz Waxman
Cinematographer: John J. Mescall
Editor: Ted J. Kent

Cast: Boris Karloff, Colin Clive, Valerie Hobson, Ernest Thesiger, Elsa Lanchester, E.E. Clive, Walter Brennan, John Carradine

http://nitroflare.com/view/48125A8605BFA97/bride.of.frankenstein.1935.720p.bluray.x264-hd4u.mkv

Language(s):English
Subtitles:English

Derek Jarman – The Tempest (1979)

$
0
0

29f7c043f76a2bde437fd0d52a185152

Quote:
Prospero, a potent necromancer, lives on a desolate isle with his virginal daughter, Miranda. He’s in exile, banished from his duchy by his usurping brother and the King of Naples. Providence brings these enemies near; aided by his vassal the spirit Ariel, Prospero conjures a tempest to wreck the Italian ship. The king’s son, thinking all others lost, becomes Prospero’s prisoner, falling in love with Miranda and she with him. Prospero’s brother and the king wander the island, as do a drunken cook and sailor, who conspire with Caliban, Prospero’s beastly slave, to murder Prospero. Prospero wants reason to triumph, Ariel wants his freedom, Miranda a husband; the sailors want to dance.







http://nitroflare.com/view/FAE9BC9EB5F27DE/Derek_Jarman_-_%281979%29_The_Tempest.mkv

Language(s):English
Subtitles:None

Viewing all 733 articles
Browse latest View live